Bark Heard Around the World for Puppy Mill Awareness

Source: Syracuse.com, May 28, 2009

www.barkaroundtheworld.com

This years Bark is being held at the Pepsi International Building and is much bigger than last year. It’s being held this Saturday May 30th from 10am – 4pm.

We have over 40 rescues from all over the country and wonderful vendors and speakers. The amazing guys from Rescue Ink will be joining us again this year – they are always a huge hit!

The Bark Heard Around The World Candlelight Vigil will be held on May 29th at 7pm in Skaneateles, NY.
It will be just to the west of the downtown section by the waterfront. We will need to stay on the public sidewalk and will need to clean up all candle or dog waste of course. Dogs need to be on a leash. There will be a prayer service provided by Robin Presnell from Small Paws Rescue. We ask that people join us for this vigil to give support to the mill dogs and to pay respects to those that have passed and to those that will die waiting for help to arrive.

Information can be found on our website at www.barkaroundtheworld.com We would love to have you attend!! You can bring your furbabies!
Bark Heard Around the World for Puppy Mill Awareness

Waterloo, N.Y. – The Beverly Animal Shelter and the Bark Heard Around the World Committee are pleased to present an education, awareness and advocacy day for puppy mill awareness to be held at the Pepsi International Building, New York State Fairgrounds on Saturday, May 30, 2009.

The event is rain or shine and will be held from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Join rescues and shelters from Georgia, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont and many more to learn about the important work they do, meet dogs in their care looking for their special forever homes and learn about the issues and concerns of mass breeding facilities known as puppy mills.

Throughout the day there will be educational opportunities from guest speakers including Dr Frank McMillan from Best Friends, Cori Menkin, ASPCA Senior Director of Legislative Initiatives, Robin Presnell from Small Paws of Oklahoma, Dr. Carl Darby from Seneca Falls specialist in the veterinary care of puppy mill survivors, Mike and Dana Harder, European Hockey League & President of Bill Alder Books, Patrick Kwan New York State Director and Arnold Baer, Director of Special Initiatives for The Humane Society of the United States (www.humanesociety.org).

Special guests include an appearance by the renown Men of Rescue Ink.

Visit with vendors and indulge yourself and pamper your pet with treats and goodies at the minimall.

A candlelight vigil is planned for Friday, May 29, 2009 at 7 p.m. Skaneateles, NY.

Bark Heard Around the World is an annual educational event dedicated to share information
about puppy mills and the abuse these dogs suffer in them, as well as ways to put a stop to this barbaric practice. The event is brought to you by The Beverly Animal Shelter, 50 E River Road Waterloo, NY 13165.
Please click here Download file to print a flyer.

Hundreds of dogs seized in puppy mill bust, WA

Source: NWCN.com, May 27, 2009

KENNEWICK, Wash. – Benton County sheriff’s deputies seized more than 300 American Eskimo dogs living in “deplorable” conditions in a Kennewick home Wednesday morning, reports the Tri-City Herald.

Officials raided the house of Ella Stewart, 66, who runs Sun Valley Kennel out of her home and breeds toy American Eskimos, around 8:30 a.m. Stewart was arrested May 12th after a deputy discovered the conditions of the breeding kennel while responding to an unrelated call at a neighbor’s home.

The Tri-City Herald reports the dogs weren’t immediately recovered because the county had no where to put them. A large group of volunteers from various animal rescue groups set up kennels at the Benton County Fairgrounds. On Wednesday, they helping transport the dogs from the home to the kennel. Each dog will be photographed and its health checked.

A PetSmart charity donated food and other dog supplies and transported the goods in its “Emergency Relif Waggin.”

Stewart has pleaded not guilty to one count of second-degree animal cruelty. She’ll return to Benton County District Court next week.

Pet food settlement stalled by appeals

Source: VINNewsService.com, May 26, 2009

Payments in a $24-million settlement of claims spurred by the largest pet food recall in U.S. history remain hung up in court.

Although the settlement was approved last November by U.S. District Court Judge Noel Hillman in New Jersey, two separate parties have appealed the settlement, effectively blocking payments indefinitely.

“This is holding it up for everybody,” said Lisa Rodriguez, a lawyer serving as liaison counsel for the 100-plus class action suits covered by the settlement.

Rodriguez said the appeals have barely advanced. “We’re just in a holding pattern right now. I don’t think there’s been a briefing scheduled yet. We’re still some time away from having the Third Circuit (Court of Appeals) even address it unless they try to deal with it summarily,” she said, referring to a quick dismissal.

A total 24,950 pet owners in the United States and Canada have applied for compensation under the settlement, according to Russell Paul, co-lead counsel for the class. Those claims are being evaluated by the accounting and consulting firm Heffler, Radetich & Saitta LLP in Philadelphia.

The claims arose from the widespread contamination of pet food by melamine and cyanuric acid, which was discovered in 2007. Investigators traced the problem to wheat gluten and rice protein made in China. Unscrupulous suppliers spiked their products with nitrogen-rich melamine, an industrial chemical not approved for consumption, in an attempt to boost apparent protein levels.

The tainted product was imported by the U.S. companies ChemNutra Inc. and Wilbur Ellis and supplied to numerous pet food makers.

The melamine, along with the chemical byproduct cyanuric acid, together formed crystals in the kidneys of dogs and cats that ate the tainted food, leading in some cases to renal failure and death.

The contamination forced the recall of more than 180 brands of pet foods and treats involving 12 different manufacturers and dozens of retailers. In all, more than 60-million containers of pet food products were recalled.

Pet owners whose claims are judged eligible may be reimbursed for expenses such as the cost of veterinary treatment, the cost of carpeting ruined by a sick animal, the cost of a dead pet or its fair market value and the cost of a new pet.

The plaintiffs who are appealing the settlement are Margaret Picus and Daniel Kaffer in one case and Jim W. Johnson and Dustin Turner in the second case.

Picus and Kaffer’s objection stems from separate legal suits involving the use of the phrase “Made in the USA” by pet food manufacturers who obtain ingredients from China.

According to court documents, Picus and Kaffer are concerned that the pet food settlement will release the manufacturers from the mislabeling claims.

Their lawyer, Kyle Nordrehaug of La Jolla, Calif., said he would not comment on pending litigation.

In the second case, the lawyer for Johnson and Turner, Jeffrey Weinstein of Tyler, Tex., reportedly contends that the settlement is not fair, reasonable or adequate.

Weinstein did not respond to telephone and e-mail messages requesting comment. However, he told the Malakoff News, a weekly newspaper in Texas, that the situation should not be handled in a one-size-fits-all manner. “Tainted pet food cannot be settled as a nationwide class because every state has different laws,” he was quoted as saying.

Because of variations in state law, he argued, plaintiffs should receive settlements based on their states’ laws. “It wouldn’t be everybody just gets the same thing,” he said.

Weinstein also said $24 million may not be enough to adequately compensate all individuals with valid claims.

Details of the settlement are posted at http://www.petfoodsettlement.com

Consumers React to NUTRO Recalls; Zinc, Copper Levels Cited Read more: “Consumers React to NUTRO Recalls; Zinc, Copper Levels Cited

Source: ConsumerAffairs.com, May 26, 2009

It’s about time. That’s how pet owners nationwide reacted to NUTRO Products’ decision last Thursday to recall two varieties of its dry cat food.

NUTRO pulled seven flavors — in 28 different bag sizes — of its dry Natural Choice Complete Care and NUTRO Max cat food off store shelves, saying the products had incorrect levels of zinc and potassium. The company blamed the problem on a production error by its U.S. premix supplier, Trouw Nutrition.

NUTRO said it discovered the error on May 18 during an audit of documentation from that Illinois-based supplier. The company, however, waited another three days — until May 21 — to recall the products. Some pet owners wonder why it took so long for NUTRO to pull the cat food, but are grateful the company finally took some action.

“I was relieved, but not very surprised,” says Kristin K. of Trenton, N.J., whose kitten started vomiting bile and experiencing uncontrollable diarrhea after eating NUTRO Natural Choice. “I figured with all the complaints I’ve seen on your Web site about these (health) problems, they weren’t coincidence and eventually NUTRO would do something. But I definitely think that NUTRO needs to take a hard look at all its food — not just its cat foods.”

NUTRO claims it hasn’t received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled products — distributed in the United States and ten other countries — but warned pet owners to monitor their cats for vomiting, diarrhea, reduction in appetite, refusal to eat food, or weight loss.

That claim outraged pet owners nationwide, who have told ConsumerAffairs.com for the past two years that their cats and dogs have experienced those same health problems after eating various flavors and varieties of NUTRO. ConsumerAffairs.com now has more than 800 complaints from dog and cat owners who say their pets have battled sudden and recurring bouts of vomiting yellow bile and explosive and often bloody diarrhea after eating NUTRO’s foods.

Many pet owners also say their dogs and cats became lethargic, had elevated liver enzymes, crystals in their urine, or been treated for pancreatitis and gastroenteritis after eating NUTRO’s pet food.

In nearly every case, pet owners say their animals’ health improved once they switched to another brand of food. Some pet owners also suspect NUTRO’s food played a role in their animals’ deaths.

NUTRO, however, says its food is 100 percent safe and meets all federal guidelines. The company also denies that it’s under investigation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — even though the FDA’s Freedom of Information Office confirmed that probe to ConsumerAffairs.com.

New Jersey probe

We’ve also learned that two FDA agents spent four hours last Friday investigating the recent and unexplained death of a 10-year-old Dalmatian in New Jersey. That is the third case ConsumerAffairs.com has confirmed in which FDA agents have investigated the deaths of dogs that have eaten NUTRO’s pet food.

In this latest case, Cheryl M. says her beloved Dalmatian, Ember, ate NUTRO food all her life. But earlier this month — after Cheryl opened a new bag of NUTRO Light Lamb and Rice that she said had a foul smell — Ember started spitting out the food.

“Then she started vomiting the food and yellow bile that had a horrible smell,” says Cheryl, who contacted the FDA and NUTRO before and after Ember’s death.

Cheryl’s veterinarian diagnosed Ember with pancreatitis and an abdominal infection. Blood tests revealed the Dalmatian had an elevated white blood cell count. The vet prescribed anti-vomiting and other medications to help the sick dog. An ultrasound also revealed Ember’s liver and pancreas were normal and the Dalmatian did not have any tumors.

Ember died in Cheryl’s arms on May 18. “My vet has no clue why she died,” Cheryl told us, her voice cracking with sorrow.

During the FDA’s visit to her home, Cheryl says the agents told her Ember’s death was a “high priority.” The agents said they were rushing Ember’s health records and lab results to the FDA’s veterinarian in Maryland — and promised to immediately test the Dalmatian’s food.

“The FDA agents seemed extremely upset that Ember died,” Cheryl says, adding the agents planned to also test the bag that Ember’s food came in. “They did not look happy. When they opened the bag of her food, they did not want to touch it and said it smelled like petroleum.

“They asked me what I wanted and I said, ‘I want justice.’ I don’t want anybody else to go through what we’re going through. We’re devastated by this.”

News of NUTRO’s cat food recall only fueled Cheryl’s fury against the company. “I was totally outraged and thought it was very convenient.”

Her husband agrees.

“When we first saw the news about the recall, we were angry,” says Ken M., a New Jersey fireman. “This (loss) has been really tough for all of us. And all these people are saying the same thing about NUTRO and NUTRO is not doing anything about it.”

Other pet owners — whose cats and dogs have become sick or died after NUTRO’s food — echo the couple’s outrage and concerns.

“It’s a first step, but NUTRO cannot just look at that little bit of cat food. It needs to look at all its food, their ingredients, and sources,” says Jean B. of Terre Haunte, Ind.

Earlier this year, Jean’s kittens — Rosie and Angus — started vomiting yellow foamy bile, shedding hair, and having gas after she slowly introduced NUTRO into the felines’ diets.

“NUTRO definitely needs to look at both its cat and dog foods — they need to look at everything,” Jean says, adding that her kittens’ health improved once she stopped feeding them NUTRO. “Most of the complaints (on ConsumerAffairs.com) are from dog owners. I don’t know why NUTRO wouldn’t be concerned by all these complaints and why they would ignore them.

“Someone is cutting corners,” she adds. “I just have to believe it comes down to money. Or NUTRO must have too much to lose — and it must be something really bad if it comes out — for them not to be taking care of this.”

Jean is also shocked by the company’s claim that it hasn’t received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled cat food.

“You’ve got to be kidding me. All these complaints are more than coincidental. Something is wrong. And in reading many letters (on ConsumerAffairs.com), pet owners say they’ve called NUTRO and not gotten a warm reception. I don’t believe they (NUTRO) haven’t received any complaints about the food. Everyday, there are new complaints on your Web site.”

No surprise

NUTRO’s cat food recall didn’t come as any surprise to Vinny B. of Tacoma, Washington.

“It made sense, especially the way my cats reacted to NUTRO after the company was purchased (in 2007) by Mars. All three of my cats refused to eat the food anymore, they lost weight, and got sick. One of my cats was on medicine until three months ago to clear up urinary crystals.

“We wondered what was going on and we called NUTRO,” Vinny says. “They said everything was the same.”

Vinny’s cats improved once he stopped feeding them NUTRO’s Natural Choice Complete Care Indoor Cat formula. So did his neighbor’s cats, which also became ill after eating NUTRO’s food.

“We were talking and he said he had been feeding his cats Nutro and they had stopped eating, too. I told him we had issues (with NUTRO) and had switched food. He switched food and his cats started eating again. It is hard to believe this is all a fluke,” Vinny says. “I believe there is something wrong with the food.”

What about NUTRO’s claim that it hasn’t received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled cat food?

“When I heard that, it made me angry,” Vinny says. “I don’t think that’s very cool. I feel like something shady going on and they (NUTRO) are not being honest with the public.”

Over the weekend, ConsumerAffairs.com heard from a Texas pet owner who says her cat became sick after eating NUTRO Max. And her veterinarian is baffled by the feline’s illness.

“For seven weeks now, my cat has been unresponsive to antibiotics for treatment of urinary tract problems,” Daphene M. told us. “He continues to urinate blood. It clears up for a 10-day period, but returns. There is no sign of extreme infection, and X-rays indicate no stones present — typically the cause.

“The veterinarian is puzzled about the root cause. Now I see this recall for Nutro Max dry cat food. I have fed this to my cat exclusively for over three years now. My cat’s diagnosis remains unknown, (but) I feel perhaps this may be the cause of his problems.”

Elkhound’s death

Indiana pet owner Mark E. is certain Nutro’s food played a role in the 2008 death of his Norwegian Elkhound, Ali.

Shortly before Ali’s death, the healthy 11-year-old dog suddenly started having bloody diarrhea, vomiting, and quit eating. At the time, Ali was staying at a kennel while Mark and his family were on vacation. When Ali became sick, the kennel took her to its vet.

“The vet said he thought she’d eaten something at the kennel,” Mark recalls. “But we asked that if that’s true, how come the only dog this happened to was the one that ate NUTRO. We have two dogs; our Collie was on a different food — not a NUTRO brand. She was in the same run and she’s fine.

“And we said: ‘what did Ali eat that the other dog didn’t.’ The only answer was the food.”

That’s why Mark wasn’t surprised when he heard the news that NUTRO had recalled some of its cat food.

“I told my wife that this was only the tip of the iceberg. NUTRO says its food is 100 percent safe, but this cat food recall puts a dent in that claim. … I feel somewhat vindicated in a way,” he says of the recall. “And I think that more (recalls) are coming, including of the dog food.”

When asked if he believes NUTRO’s claim that it hasn’t received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled cat food, Mark told us: “I think that’s a C-Y-A. They know something is wrong. They are just trying to ease into this as gently as possible.”

What about NUTRO’s claim that it isn’t under investigation by the FDA? Mark says that’s not true, either.

“An FDA agent came out to my house (after Ali died) and took down all the information,” he says. “The agent said they’d (his FDA office) gotten a number of complaints about NUTRO. He said he was aware of the problems nationally and the problems included on your (ConsumerAffairs.com) Web site.”

Zinc, copper levels

ConsumerAffairs.com also uncovered an interesting connection between the NUTRO food that Ali ate before her death and the NUTRO products involved in the cat food recall.

After Ali died, Mark’s vet sent the NUTRO food the Norwegian Elkhound had eaten to Purdue University for testing. Those tests were negative for melamine, salmonella, and e-coli, Mark said. But they did reveal the food contained high levels of zinc and copper.

Mark’s vet could not say if the food caused Ali’s death, but “he could not rule it out.”

That isn’t the only case in which NUTRO’s dog food has tested positive for high levels of zinc and copper.

Last August, tests by the non-profit Pet Food Products Safety Alliance (PFPSA) revealed samples of NUTRO’s Natural Choice Chicken Meal, Rice, and Oatmeal formula and Nutro Puppy Max contained levels of zinc and copper that PFPSA said exceeded the recommendations of the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO).

Specifically, the levels of zinc in the NUTRO dog foods tested were 260 parts per million, which PFPSA calculated “would come to on the order of 40 times the amount of zinc recommended for human dietary requirements.”

PFPSA’s founder Don Earl says NUTRO’s cat food recall — trigged by “incorrect levels of zinc and potassium” — gives credence to his organization’s test results.

“I feel a certain amount of vindication as a result, particularly as the symptoms are identical to those reported by legions of dog owners,” he told us.

But Earl is still worried about what pet food makers can legally put in their products.

“The most frightening aspect of the situation is that from the research I’ve done, I believe it’s possible to formulate a food within AAFCO tolerances, and still end up with a product that would be lethal to pets within a matter of days to weeks.”

NUTRO, however, disputes PFPSA’s lab results.

“The claims regarding the safety of Nutro pet food in a recent report posted on the Pet Food Product Safety Alliance website are unfounded,” the company states on its Web site. “In order for a food to provide all the essential nutrition for a pet, it must exceed the minimum requirements for all essential nutrients. AAFCO has established Nutrient Profiles which identify these minimum dietary levels for all essential nutrients in canine pet food products….the 260- 400 mg/kg diet levels of Zinc found in NUTRO® Natural Choice Chicken, Meal, Rice and Oatmeal Formula (which converts to approximately 288-444 mg/kg dry matter) are well within AAFCO recommended levels.”

NUTRO didn’t disclose the levels of zinc and potassium in its recalled cat foods, but said it was taking immediate action to pull the products off the market.

ConsumerAffairs.com contacted Trouw Nutrition, which supplied the zinc and potassium premix used in NUTRO’s recalled cat food. The company did not return our call.

NUTRO, however, has advised consumers to immediately stop feeding the recalled food to their cats.

But Gayle S. of Nevada — whose Labradoodle recently become gravely ill after eating NUTRO’s dry puppy food — says that warning isn’t broad enough to calm her fears. She urges pet owners to immediately stop feeding their dogs and cats any NUTRO products.

“I want them (NUTRO) to pull every single product off the shelves,” she told us. “It almost killed my puppy. I know something is wrong with that food. And, as a consumer, I would to see NUTRO off the market until it (the company) is 100 percent sure its food is not tainted.”

Gayle says her five-month-old puppy, William, recently stopped eating, started vomiting yellow bile, and experiencing explosive diarrhea.

“My dog exploded in the vet’s office,” she says. “There was urine and blood dripping from the dog. He had terrible diarrhea. When he tried to poop, red blood would be dripping out of the dog. That’s what scared me.”

Campylobacter

Tests revealed William had Giardia, an infection that Gayle says the puppy could have caught from his litter mates. William in now on medication for that illness.

But the tests also revealed that William had another disease — one Gayle’s vet said could be caused by contaminated food. That disease is called Campylobacter.

We shared William’s test results with veterinary toxicologist Steven Hansen, director of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal’s (ASPCA) Poison Control Center.

“This looks like an interesting case,” he said. “Campylobacter can be found in normal dogs and cats, which does complicate this. Yes, this bacterium can be obtained from contaminated food, water, fresh meats and the environment. I am very hopeful that the exact packets that were fed this pup will be cultured for possible bacterial contamination. Otherwise, there are many ways that dogs can consume material contaminated with Campylobacter.”

Back in Nevada, Gayle continues to search for answers about her puppy’s illness.

She’s already contacted NUTRO and the FDA about William’s illness. NUTRO, she says, told her “nothing could be wrong with its food” and did not offer to test William’s food.

The FDA is now is trying to make arrangements to test William’s food. PetSmart has also offered to analyze the puppy’s food.

Conflicting stories

NUTRO’s recall came just days after ConsumerAffairs.com appealed a denial by the (FDA) to release consumer complaints and lab results related to the company’s pet food.

ConsumerAffairs.com requested the documents last Spring under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The FDA denied the request, saying the release of those the records could interfere with law enforcement proceedings. An FDA official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, also told ConsumerAffairs.com that our request was denied because the agency was investigating NUTRO.

The FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), however, later issued a press release claiming NUTRO was not under investigation. But the CVM is not the FDA division that handles complaints about pet food and is not the division that confirmed the investigation.

ConsumerAffairs.com has also independently confirmed that FDA agents have investigated the deaths of dogs that ate NUTRO pet food.

“Though the reports on whether the FDA is investigating Nutro have been conflicting, the FDA’s official position is that there is no pending investigation of Nutro,” said New York attorney, Cameron Stracher, who filed the appeal for ConsumerAffairs.com. “Therefore, the FDA may not rely on the ‘law enforcement’ exemption of FOIA because, according to the FDA, there is no pending enforcement proceeding against Nutro.”

Meanwhile, NUTRO said pet owners who have any of the recalled cat food can return the products for a full refund. Pet owners who have questions or concerns about the recall can contact NUTRO at 1-800-833-5330.

Recycling Goes to the Dogs, Reduce. Reuse. Rewoof.

Eleven years ago Alex Fisher and his then business partner had a vision for a new dog toy that was strong, buoyant and environmentally friendly. The result? Planet Dog’s wildly popular Orbee-Tuff Ball (you know the one, it’s the rubber ball shaped like the earth). In addition to selling this and other products on a national level, Planet Dog opened its own flagship store in Portland, Maine in 2004. Five years later, Planet Dog is making its mark on the pet industry not only for its wide selection of pet products, but also because of the company’s environmentally and socially conscious business model.

According to Catherine Frost, Brand and Product Champion for Planet Dog, the Orbee-Tuff products “put us on the map.” Still a best seller, Orbee-Tuff toys are made from melted rubber pellets and produce no waste. This is because all of the left-over rubber material is then recycled into another line of dog toys, RecycleBALLS, which display the words “Reduce. Reuse. Rewoof.” on them, and RecycleBONES, both of which are made from 100% recycled materials. Even the toys themselves can be recycled. To encourage pet owners to recycle their Orbee toys, Planet Dog has recently launched a program in the store, where customers can bring in old pet toys and drop them off in a mail box that serves as a recycling bin. The old toys are transported to company factories in Sanford, Maine and Uxbridge, Massachusetts, and are then melted down and reused to make new ones. Another product, the Shammy towel, is also made from 100% recycled materials (derived from wood chips) and are made to dry quickly so that they do not require electric drying.

In addition to dog toys, Planet Dog sells pet food, treats, collars, leashes, and basically anything else a family dog might need. All of the dog food and treats carried in the Planet Dog store are all-natural and several are organic. Many dog owners look for less processed food for their dogs, says Ken Hahn, Store Manager, because, “It’s healthy. There’s a lot of evidence that feeding your dog a less processed diet is better…” The store is stocked with products made by local vendors from Maine and New England, including farmers who produce all-natural and or organic ingredients.

Planet Dog also encourages its employees and others to use green practices whenever possible. According to Ken Hahn, the store now has a no-idling policy for deliveries. Employees are encouraged to use recycling bins for their own as well as the store’s waste. Planet Dog also has a no bottled water policy and they have installed water filters on their faucets as an alternative. Employees are asked to bring their own reusable bottles to fill throughout the day. At the company headquarters, also in Portland, there is even a composting station for employees to use if they choose. Planet Dog has an incentive program for employees who choose hybrid vehicles, by offering to reimburse each employee up to 50% of the excise tax due on the cars.

The store and headquarters use dimmer switches to conserve electricity and are also in the process of converting to energy efficient lighting. They do not use toxic cleaners that contain bleach or other harsh chemicals. Another green innovation has been the use of a virtual trade show rather than traveling to another location, to promote Planet Dog’s products. With a virtual trade show, a company can showcase its products online, which can save them money as well as reducing the amount of fuel that is consumed then emitted into the air.

Planet Dog is also very active within the community, supporting charitable causes such as pet adoptions and they are also a sponsor for The Bayside Trail. The Bayside Trail is a new neighborhood trail in Portland that conserves open space for walking and other recreational purposes. Additionally, a portion of the company’s sales are directed to The Planet Dog Foundation, an accredited charity that supports service dogs who assist humans in valuable and life-saving ways. According to Catherine Frost, the company refers to its efforts to be socially responsible as “Romping the Romp” and are a part of the company’s overall mission.

Planet Dog will be hosting a Groundbreaking Celebration for The Bayside Trail, to be held on the trail (just behind the store) on June 6, 2009.
For more information about the event or about Planet Dog:
www.planetdog.com or
www.planetdogfoundation.org
Planet Dog
211 Marginal Way
Portland, Maine 04101 (207)-761-1515

Ohio Legislators Propose Pet Store Warranty Provisions and Dog Breeding Regulations

Source: PetProductNews.com, May 26, 2009

Ohio state legislators have introduced a measure that sets forth dog warranty provisions for pet stores as well as licensing and insurance requirements for dog breeding kennels. The measure, House Bill 124, is scheduled for a public hearing on May 27 before a House committee.

As introduced, HB 124 (and companion bill SB 95) would require any pet store that sells dogs to provide buyers with a money-back guarantee valid for up to 21 days after the date of the sale. The guarantee will allow the buyer to receive the purchase price of the dog if he or she presents the store with a statement from a veterinarian saying the dog has a significant disease, illness or injury that was in existence at the time of the purchase. The veterinarian must examine the pet within 14 days of the purchase of the dog.

In addition to a money-back guarantee, pet stores would also be required to provide the following at the time of sale:

  • A certificate of medial health completed by a veterinarian stating that the dog has been examined and there was no evidence of disease, illness, or injury at the time of examination
    .
  • The name, complete address and telephone number of the breeder that bred the dog, the regulated dog breeding kennel where the dog was kept; and the regulated dog intermediary from whom the pet store acquired the dog, as applicable.

Violators will be liable for an amount that is equal to the actual damages incurred by the buyer within one year after the date of purchase (veterinary expenses are limited to no more than $500). The pet store will also be liable for any attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the buyer. In addition, the buyer may be entitled to keep the dog.

With regard to kennels, the proposed bill would require each regulated dog breeding kennel to apply for a license. HB 124 defines a “regulated dog breeding kennel” as “an establishment that keeps, houses, and maintains adult breeding dogs that produce either at least nine litters of puppies or at least 40 puppies in any given calendar year, and, in return for a fee or other consideration, sells, exchanges or leases adult dogs or puppies.”

No dog breeding kennel would be allowed to operate without a kennel license. As part of the license application, kennels would have to show evidence of insurance or of a surety bond payable to the authority. The bill also provides standards for enclosures and veterinary care, among other requirements

Kennels are subject to at least one biennial inspection. Kennel operators will be given the opportunity to remedy a violation. If the violation is not remediated, a license may be revoked and operators may face civil penalties of up to $15,000.

HB 124 is scheduled for a  public hearing before the House Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources on May 27 at 9:30 a.m. SB 95 has been referred to the Senate Committee on State and Local Government and Veterans Affairs where it is awaiting its first committee hearing.

Video of raid on alleged puppy mill will be released, WA

Source: Heraldnet.com, May 27, 2009

GOLD BAR — A video taken by Snohomish County officials during the January raid of a suspected million-dollar puppy mill may be released to the media, a judge ruled Tuesday.

The video is evidence in a high-profile animal cruelty case.

Defense attorneys tried to block the video’s distribution, arguing widespread broadcast may hurt their clients’ chances for a fair trial.

Snohomish County Superior Court Judge Ronald Castleberry disagreed.

The video is scheduled to be released Thursday by the Snohomish County prosecutor’s office.

Jason and Serena Larsen, both 37, are charged with six counts each of first-degree animal cruelty.

Snohomish County sheriff’s deputies and animal control officers on Jan. 16 raided a home outside Gold Bar and rescued about 160 dogs. Many of the animals were covered with urine and feces. Dead dogs were found in a freezer. A mummified dog’s body was found on the property.

The video was taken by investigators raiding the home.

The Larsens lived in the house and were responsible for the dogs’ care, prosecutors allege.

The Larsens have said the dogs belong to someone else and they were led to believe they broke no laws. They said they were breeding the dogs for a Snohomish woman who allegedly earned millions of dollars a year, court papers said.

Local media have paid close attention to the case, often featuring images of the abused puppies. A Seattle television station filed a public records request for the video, sparking the legal wrangling. The Herald also has filed a records request in the case.

Mickey Krom and Gabriel Rothstein, lawyers for the Larsens, argued release of the video may bias a potential jury pool. They also said the video could inflame already high emotions and bring the Larsens harm.

Since being charged, the Larsens have received five threatening letters, according to a written statement submitted by Jason Larsen.

“One of the letters said that there were people watching us,” Jason Larsen wrote.

After hearing arguments about the video last week, Castleberry privately reviewed the video.

It is poor quality and is “not nearly as horrific or graphic as has been argued to the court,” Castleberry said. The judge said written descriptions of the alleged animal abuse was more disturbing than that portrayed in the video.

He ruled releasing the video, as required under the state’s public disclosure laws, shouldn’t interfere with the Larsens’ constitutional right to a fair trial before an impartial jury.

Even during headline-grabbing death penalty cases, lawyers have been able to seat Snohomish County jurors who hadn’t heard about the cases, Castleberry said.

The Larsens’ attorneys may ask for a change of venue if they believe an unbiased jury cannot be empaneled, the judge said.

The puppy mill investigation is still ongoing, Snohomish County deputy prosecuting attorney Jarett Goodkin said.

Following the Gold Bar raid, the investigation expanded to a Mount Vernon-area kennel, where 450 dogs were seized. A Snohomish kennel, Wags ‘n’ Wiggles, operated by Renee Roske, also is under investigation.

Jason Larsen has said the dogs in Gold Bar belonged to Roske. Roske has denied owning the dogs. She hasn’t been charged in connection with the case.

Authorities must redact images from the video that show personal financial papers, which are exempt from disclosure under state law.

The Larsens’ trial is scheduled to begin July 31.

Big Paw Designs

bpbanner2

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes