Nature’s Variety Expands Nationwide Voluntary Recall to Include All Raw Frozen Chicken Diets with Any ‘Best If Used By’ Date On or Before 2/5/11

Source: PRNewswire.com, Mar 8, 2010

Nature’s Variety has expanded its voluntary recall of Chicken Formula Raw Frozen Diets for dogs and cats to include the “Best If Used By” dates of 10/29/10 and 11/9/10 because these products may be contaminated with Salmonella.  Salmonella can affect animals and there is risk to humans from handling contaminated pet products. People handling pet food can become infected with Salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the product or any surfaces exposed to these products.

Healthy people infected with Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments, including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms. Consumers exhibiting these signs after having contact with this product should contact their healthcare providers.

Pets with Salmonella infections may become lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, or vomiting. Some pets may experience only a decreased appetite, fever, or abdominal pain. If your pet has consumed any of the affected products and is experiencing any of these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

The recall includes the following products with a “Best If Used By” date of 10/29/10 or 11/9/10:

  • UPC#7 69949 60131 9 – Chicken Formula 0.75 lb trial sized medallions
  • UPC#7 69949 60130 2 – Chicken Formula 3 lb medallions
  • UPC#7 69949 60120 3 – Chicken Formula 6 lb patties
  • UPC#7 69949 60121 0 – Chicken Formula 2 lb single chubs

In an abundance of caution, Nature’s Variety has also chosen to expand this voluntary recall to include all Chicken Formula and Organic Chicken Formula Raw Frozen Diets for dogs and cats with any “Best If Used By” date on or before 2/5/11.  Nature’s Variety has elected to clear the market of raw frozen chicken diets as it implements a state-of-the-art new food safety process called High Pressure Pasteurization for use on all Nature’s Variety Raw Frozen Diets.

The products included in the expanded recall are any Chicken Formula or Organic Chicken Formula Raw Frozen Diet with a “Best If Used By” date on or before 2/5/11, including:

  • UPC#7 69949 60131 9 – Chicken Formula 0.75 lb trial sized medallions
  • UPC#7 69949 60130 2 – Chicken Formula 3 lb medallions
  • UPC#7 69949 60120 3 – Chicken Formula 6 lb patties
  • UPC#7 69949 60121 0 – Chicken Formula 2 lb single chubs
  • UPC#7 69949 50121 3 – Chicken Formula 12 lb case of chubs
  • UPC#7 69949 60137 1 – Organic Chicken Formula 3 lb medallions
  • UPC#7 69949 60127 2 – Organic Chicken Formula 6 lb patties

The “Best If Used By” date is located on the back of the package above the safe handling instructions.  The affected product was distributed through retail stores and internet sales in the United States and Canada.

No other Raw Frozen Diets are involved in this expansion other than chicken, and no other Nature’s Variety products are involved.

Nature’s Variety now uses High Pressure Pasteurization on their Raw Frozen Diets as a unique process to kill pathogenic bacteria through high-pressure, water-based technology.  Having incorporated this state-of-the-art technology on a portion of their raw product offerings in late 2009, Nature’s Variety was able to confidently implement the process universally on all Raw Frozen Diets after the 2/11/10 recall in order to enhance food safety.  Nature’s Variety also utilizes a test and hold protocol to ensure that all High Pressure Pasteurized Raw Frozen Diets test negative for harmful bacteria before being released for sale.

“Nature’s Variety believes replacing all raw frozen chicken products on the market with new raw frozen chicken products that use High Pressure Pasteurization is an important and responsible step in order to reinforce consumer confidence and trust,” stated Reed Howlett, CEO of Nature’s Variety.  ”By recalling all raw frozen chicken products with ‘Best If Used By’ dates on or before 2/5/11, we can provide our pet parents with new raw frozen chicken products that have been processed through High Pressure Pasteurization. Adopting High Pressure Pasteurization is an important step to ensure that our products meet the strictest quality and food safety standards.”

Howlett stated, “Our commitment to consumers in the future is the same as it’s been in the past – to offer Raw Frozen Diets made from the highest quality ingredients, made in our own plant in the Midwest, by people who care deeply about pet nutrition, health, and happiness.”

If you are a consumer and have purchased one of these products, please return the unopened product to your retailer for a full refund or replacement.  If your package has been opened, please dispose of the raw food in a safe manner by securing it in a covered trash receptacle.  Then, bring your receipt (or the empty package in a sealed bag) to your local retailer for a full refund or replacement.

Consumers with additional questions can call the Nature’s Variety dedicated Customer Care line 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at 800-374-3142.  For additional resources about High Pressure Pasteurization or other Nature’s Variety food safety protocols, visit www.naturesvariety.com.

About Nature’s Variety

Nature’s Variety specializes in natural, holistic dog and cat food.  The line of premium products was developed by families who have been practicing sustainable agriculture for more than 140 years, raising quality livestock and growing crops in America’s heartland.  Nature’s Variety offers the purest forms of pet nutrition – including a wide variety of protein choices in every pet food form (raw frozen diets, dry kibble diets, canned diets, and treats).  For more information about Nature’s Variety, visit www.naturesvariety.com.

Pet-Tao Introduces New Line of Nutritional Dog Food

Source: Businesswire.com, Dec 14, 2009

Veterinarians Combine Western Nutritional Science with Eastern Food Therapy

After years of treating pets and studying both Western and Eastern veterinary medicine, two Nashville veterinarians have founded Pet-Tao Pet Foods to provide dogs a diet designed to help them lead a longer, healthier life.

During their decades in private practice, veterinarians Dr. Marc Smith and Dr. Casey Damron encountered numerous clinical cases that did not respond to the treatments used in traditional veterinary medicine. They wanted to provide more for “man’s best friend” — not only in treatment options, but also in prevention strategies.

Upon completing training at the Chi Institute, the veterinarians concluded that fresh food based on sound Eastern principles is the foundation for a long, happy, and healthy life. After two years of intensive research and development, the vets have launched Pet-Tao Pet Foods, believed to be the first dog food that combines the strengths of Western Nutritional Science with the time-proven theories of Eastern Medicine, primarily Eastern Food Therapy.

In Eastern Food Therapy, food items are chosen and combined in ways to heal the body as well as keep it in balance. The focus is on the effect the food has on the body after it is eaten. Each food item is described as having energetic properties such as warming, cooling, or flavors that act on the body in certain predictable yet different ways.

Pet-Tao Pet Foods is now being sold nationally through a network of 70 partner veterinarians, select retail locations, and direct to consumers through www.pet-tao.com. Testimonials from appreciative dog owners are flooding in from across the country. For instance, Moose, a seven-year-old male castrated Yellow Lab, had numerous medical problems including obesity, skin and ear disease, and a thyroid condition. On the Pet-Tao Yin Diet for 120 days now, Moose has lost 11 lbs.; his skin disease has improved by 50 percent; and his thyroid medication has been reduced by 50 percent.

Pet-Tao Pet Foods is made from human-grade ingredients, consisting primarily of muscle and organ meat (beef, chicken, turkey and fish), vegetables and culinary herbals. It is all-natural with added vitamins and minerals and has no artificial preservatives or flavors.

For more information, visit www.pettao.com or call 615-934-3832. Also, check out Pet-Tao news on Facebook and follow Dr. Smith’s blog.

CANIDAE All Natural Pet Foods Expands Its All Natural Cat Food Line With Two Grain Free Feline Formulas

Source: PRWeb.com, June 5, 2009

CANIDAE All Natural Pet Foods is pleased to announce that its line of all natural holistic cat foods is expanding to meet the growing demands of pet owners who desire to feed their cats a dry kibble formula free from grains.

San Luis Obispo, CA (PRWEB) June 5, 2009 — CANIDAE Pet Foods, Inc. (www.canidae.com), a manufacturer of all natural holistic pet foods that are fed and recommended by thousands of certified breeders and rescue organizations throughout North America, is expanding its line of all natural holistic cat foods to include two new grain free formulas.

Late last year, CANIDAE introduced two new grain free formulas to its line of all natural holistic dog foods. CANIDAE Controller Jason Castillo commented on the grain free dog foods, “The Grain Free All Life Stages and Grain Free Salmon formulas we introduced last year are a big success with dog owners. Cat owners have also been asking for all natural grain free diets. Since cats generally require an even higher level of protein than dogs, we feel grain free makes a lot of sense for felines. So, we’re very proud to once again deliver what our customers have asked for by offering two new wholesome and nutritious super-premium cat foods that are completely grain free.”

FELIDAE Grain Free Cat and Kitten formula promotes a healthy meat-focused feline diet by featuring chicken, turkey and fish meals as well as fresh lamb as protein sources, while the FELIDAE Grain Free Salmon formula includes cold water Pacific salmon meal as the primary protein source. For both formulas, 80% of the total protein is derived from meat, 20% from vegetables and fruits, and 0% from grains. These formulas also feature essential antioxidant vitamins and amino acid chelated minerals, carefully balanced Omega 6 and Omega 3 fatty acids with a 5 to 1 ratio for optimal nutrition, guaranteed viable micro-organisms, and cranberries for urinary tract health.

As with all CANIDAE pet food products, these new feline formulas are designed for superior digestibility and excellent palatability and are made the CANIDAE® way with no corn, wheat, soy, grain fractions or fillers and naturally preserved.

Both new FELIDAE Grain Free Cat Food formulas will begin arriving at thousands of independent pet food retailers throughout North America in July 2009.

Pet food settlement stalled by appeals

Source: VINNewsService.com, May 26, 2009

Payments in a $24-million settlement of claims spurred by the largest pet food recall in U.S. history remain hung up in court.

Although the settlement was approved last November by U.S. District Court Judge Noel Hillman in New Jersey, two separate parties have appealed the settlement, effectively blocking payments indefinitely.

“This is holding it up for everybody,” said Lisa Rodriguez, a lawyer serving as liaison counsel for the 100-plus class action suits covered by the settlement.

Rodriguez said the appeals have barely advanced. “We’re just in a holding pattern right now. I don’t think there’s been a briefing scheduled yet. We’re still some time away from having the Third Circuit (Court of Appeals) even address it unless they try to deal with it summarily,” she said, referring to a quick dismissal.

A total 24,950 pet owners in the United States and Canada have applied for compensation under the settlement, according to Russell Paul, co-lead counsel for the class. Those claims are being evaluated by the accounting and consulting firm Heffler, Radetich & Saitta LLP in Philadelphia.

The claims arose from the widespread contamination of pet food by melamine and cyanuric acid, which was discovered in 2007. Investigators traced the problem to wheat gluten and rice protein made in China. Unscrupulous suppliers spiked their products with nitrogen-rich melamine, an industrial chemical not approved for consumption, in an attempt to boost apparent protein levels.

The tainted product was imported by the U.S. companies ChemNutra Inc. and Wilbur Ellis and supplied to numerous pet food makers.

The melamine, along with the chemical byproduct cyanuric acid, together formed crystals in the kidneys of dogs and cats that ate the tainted food, leading in some cases to renal failure and death.

The contamination forced the recall of more than 180 brands of pet foods and treats involving 12 different manufacturers and dozens of retailers. In all, more than 60-million containers of pet food products were recalled.

Pet owners whose claims are judged eligible may be reimbursed for expenses such as the cost of veterinary treatment, the cost of carpeting ruined by a sick animal, the cost of a dead pet or its fair market value and the cost of a new pet.

The plaintiffs who are appealing the settlement are Margaret Picus and Daniel Kaffer in one case and Jim W. Johnson and Dustin Turner in the second case.

Picus and Kaffer’s objection stems from separate legal suits involving the use of the phrase “Made in the USA” by pet food manufacturers who obtain ingredients from China.

According to court documents, Picus and Kaffer are concerned that the pet food settlement will release the manufacturers from the mislabeling claims.

Their lawyer, Kyle Nordrehaug of La Jolla, Calif., said he would not comment on pending litigation.

In the second case, the lawyer for Johnson and Turner, Jeffrey Weinstein of Tyler, Tex., reportedly contends that the settlement is not fair, reasonable or adequate.

Weinstein did not respond to telephone and e-mail messages requesting comment. However, he told the Malakoff News, a weekly newspaper in Texas, that the situation should not be handled in a one-size-fits-all manner. “Tainted pet food cannot be settled as a nationwide class because every state has different laws,” he was quoted as saying.

Because of variations in state law, he argued, plaintiffs should receive settlements based on their states’ laws. “It wouldn’t be everybody just gets the same thing,” he said.

Weinstein also said $24 million may not be enough to adequately compensate all individuals with valid claims.

Details of the settlement are posted at http://www.petfoodsettlement.com

Consumers React to NUTRO Recalls; Zinc, Copper Levels Cited Read more: “Consumers React to NUTRO Recalls; Zinc, Copper Levels Cited

Source: ConsumerAffairs.com, May 26, 2009

It’s about time. That’s how pet owners nationwide reacted to NUTRO Products’ decision last Thursday to recall two varieties of its dry cat food.

NUTRO pulled seven flavors — in 28 different bag sizes — of its dry Natural Choice Complete Care and NUTRO Max cat food off store shelves, saying the products had incorrect levels of zinc and potassium. The company blamed the problem on a production error by its U.S. premix supplier, Trouw Nutrition.

NUTRO said it discovered the error on May 18 during an audit of documentation from that Illinois-based supplier. The company, however, waited another three days — until May 21 — to recall the products. Some pet owners wonder why it took so long for NUTRO to pull the cat food, but are grateful the company finally took some action.

“I was relieved, but not very surprised,” says Kristin K. of Trenton, N.J., whose kitten started vomiting bile and experiencing uncontrollable diarrhea after eating NUTRO Natural Choice. “I figured with all the complaints I’ve seen on your Web site about these (health) problems, they weren’t coincidence and eventually NUTRO would do something. But I definitely think that NUTRO needs to take a hard look at all its food — not just its cat foods.”

NUTRO claims it hasn’t received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled products — distributed in the United States and ten other countries — but warned pet owners to monitor their cats for vomiting, diarrhea, reduction in appetite, refusal to eat food, or weight loss.

That claim outraged pet owners nationwide, who have told ConsumerAffairs.com for the past two years that their cats and dogs have experienced those same health problems after eating various flavors and varieties of NUTRO. ConsumerAffairs.com now has more than 800 complaints from dog and cat owners who say their pets have battled sudden and recurring bouts of vomiting yellow bile and explosive and often bloody diarrhea after eating NUTRO’s foods.

Many pet owners also say their dogs and cats became lethargic, had elevated liver enzymes, crystals in their urine, or been treated for pancreatitis and gastroenteritis after eating NUTRO’s pet food.

In nearly every case, pet owners say their animals’ health improved once they switched to another brand of food. Some pet owners also suspect NUTRO’s food played a role in their animals’ deaths.

NUTRO, however, says its food is 100 percent safe and meets all federal guidelines. The company also denies that it’s under investigation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — even though the FDA’s Freedom of Information Office confirmed that probe to ConsumerAffairs.com.

New Jersey probe

We’ve also learned that two FDA agents spent four hours last Friday investigating the recent and unexplained death of a 10-year-old Dalmatian in New Jersey. That is the third case ConsumerAffairs.com has confirmed in which FDA agents have investigated the deaths of dogs that have eaten NUTRO’s pet food.

In this latest case, Cheryl M. says her beloved Dalmatian, Ember, ate NUTRO food all her life. But earlier this month — after Cheryl opened a new bag of NUTRO Light Lamb and Rice that she said had a foul smell — Ember started spitting out the food.

“Then she started vomiting the food and yellow bile that had a horrible smell,” says Cheryl, who contacted the FDA and NUTRO before and after Ember’s death.

Cheryl’s veterinarian diagnosed Ember with pancreatitis and an abdominal infection. Blood tests revealed the Dalmatian had an elevated white blood cell count. The vet prescribed anti-vomiting and other medications to help the sick dog. An ultrasound also revealed Ember’s liver and pancreas were normal and the Dalmatian did not have any tumors.

Ember died in Cheryl’s arms on May 18. “My vet has no clue why she died,” Cheryl told us, her voice cracking with sorrow.

During the FDA’s visit to her home, Cheryl says the agents told her Ember’s death was a “high priority.” The agents said they were rushing Ember’s health records and lab results to the FDA’s veterinarian in Maryland — and promised to immediately test the Dalmatian’s food.

“The FDA agents seemed extremely upset that Ember died,” Cheryl says, adding the agents planned to also test the bag that Ember’s food came in. “They did not look happy. When they opened the bag of her food, they did not want to touch it and said it smelled like petroleum.

“They asked me what I wanted and I said, ‘I want justice.’ I don’t want anybody else to go through what we’re going through. We’re devastated by this.”

News of NUTRO’s cat food recall only fueled Cheryl’s fury against the company. “I was totally outraged and thought it was very convenient.”

Her husband agrees.

“When we first saw the news about the recall, we were angry,” says Ken M., a New Jersey fireman. “This (loss) has been really tough for all of us. And all these people are saying the same thing about NUTRO and NUTRO is not doing anything about it.”

Other pet owners — whose cats and dogs have become sick or died after NUTRO’s food — echo the couple’s outrage and concerns.

“It’s a first step, but NUTRO cannot just look at that little bit of cat food. It needs to look at all its food, their ingredients, and sources,” says Jean B. of Terre Haunte, Ind.

Earlier this year, Jean’s kittens — Rosie and Angus — started vomiting yellow foamy bile, shedding hair, and having gas after she slowly introduced NUTRO into the felines’ diets.

“NUTRO definitely needs to look at both its cat and dog foods — they need to look at everything,” Jean says, adding that her kittens’ health improved once she stopped feeding them NUTRO. “Most of the complaints (on ConsumerAffairs.com) are from dog owners. I don’t know why NUTRO wouldn’t be concerned by all these complaints and why they would ignore them.

“Someone is cutting corners,” she adds. “I just have to believe it comes down to money. Or NUTRO must have too much to lose — and it must be something really bad if it comes out — for them not to be taking care of this.”

Jean is also shocked by the company’s claim that it hasn’t received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled cat food.

“You’ve got to be kidding me. All these complaints are more than coincidental. Something is wrong. And in reading many letters (on ConsumerAffairs.com), pet owners say they’ve called NUTRO and not gotten a warm reception. I don’t believe they (NUTRO) haven’t received any complaints about the food. Everyday, there are new complaints on your Web site.”

No surprise

NUTRO’s cat food recall didn’t come as any surprise to Vinny B. of Tacoma, Washington.

“It made sense, especially the way my cats reacted to NUTRO after the company was purchased (in 2007) by Mars. All three of my cats refused to eat the food anymore, they lost weight, and got sick. One of my cats was on medicine until three months ago to clear up urinary crystals.

“We wondered what was going on and we called NUTRO,” Vinny says. “They said everything was the same.”

Vinny’s cats improved once he stopped feeding them NUTRO’s Natural Choice Complete Care Indoor Cat formula. So did his neighbor’s cats, which also became ill after eating NUTRO’s food.

“We were talking and he said he had been feeding his cats Nutro and they had stopped eating, too. I told him we had issues (with NUTRO) and had switched food. He switched food and his cats started eating again. It is hard to believe this is all a fluke,” Vinny says. “I believe there is something wrong with the food.”

What about NUTRO’s claim that it hasn’t received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled cat food?

“When I heard that, it made me angry,” Vinny says. “I don’t think that’s very cool. I feel like something shady going on and they (NUTRO) are not being honest with the public.”

Over the weekend, ConsumerAffairs.com heard from a Texas pet owner who says her cat became sick after eating NUTRO Max. And her veterinarian is baffled by the feline’s illness.

“For seven weeks now, my cat has been unresponsive to antibiotics for treatment of urinary tract problems,” Daphene M. told us. “He continues to urinate blood. It clears up for a 10-day period, but returns. There is no sign of extreme infection, and X-rays indicate no stones present — typically the cause.

“The veterinarian is puzzled about the root cause. Now I see this recall for Nutro Max dry cat food. I have fed this to my cat exclusively for over three years now. My cat’s diagnosis remains unknown, (but) I feel perhaps this may be the cause of his problems.”

Elkhound’s death

Indiana pet owner Mark E. is certain Nutro’s food played a role in the 2008 death of his Norwegian Elkhound, Ali.

Shortly before Ali’s death, the healthy 11-year-old dog suddenly started having bloody diarrhea, vomiting, and quit eating. At the time, Ali was staying at a kennel while Mark and his family were on vacation. When Ali became sick, the kennel took her to its vet.

“The vet said he thought she’d eaten something at the kennel,” Mark recalls. “But we asked that if that’s true, how come the only dog this happened to was the one that ate NUTRO. We have two dogs; our Collie was on a different food — not a NUTRO brand. She was in the same run and she’s fine.

“And we said: ‘what did Ali eat that the other dog didn’t.’ The only answer was the food.”

That’s why Mark wasn’t surprised when he heard the news that NUTRO had recalled some of its cat food.

“I told my wife that this was only the tip of the iceberg. NUTRO says its food is 100 percent safe, but this cat food recall puts a dent in that claim. … I feel somewhat vindicated in a way,” he says of the recall. “And I think that more (recalls) are coming, including of the dog food.”

When asked if he believes NUTRO’s claim that it hasn’t received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled cat food, Mark told us: “I think that’s a C-Y-A. They know something is wrong. They are just trying to ease into this as gently as possible.”

What about NUTRO’s claim that it isn’t under investigation by the FDA? Mark says that’s not true, either.

“An FDA agent came out to my house (after Ali died) and took down all the information,” he says. “The agent said they’d (his FDA office) gotten a number of complaints about NUTRO. He said he was aware of the problems nationally and the problems included on your (ConsumerAffairs.com) Web site.”

Zinc, copper levels

ConsumerAffairs.com also uncovered an interesting connection between the NUTRO food that Ali ate before her death and the NUTRO products involved in the cat food recall.

After Ali died, Mark’s vet sent the NUTRO food the Norwegian Elkhound had eaten to Purdue University for testing. Those tests were negative for melamine, salmonella, and e-coli, Mark said. But they did reveal the food contained high levels of zinc and copper.

Mark’s vet could not say if the food caused Ali’s death, but “he could not rule it out.”

That isn’t the only case in which NUTRO’s dog food has tested positive for high levels of zinc and copper.

Last August, tests by the non-profit Pet Food Products Safety Alliance (PFPSA) revealed samples of NUTRO’s Natural Choice Chicken Meal, Rice, and Oatmeal formula and Nutro Puppy Max contained levels of zinc and copper that PFPSA said exceeded the recommendations of the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO).

Specifically, the levels of zinc in the NUTRO dog foods tested were 260 parts per million, which PFPSA calculated “would come to on the order of 40 times the amount of zinc recommended for human dietary requirements.”

PFPSA’s founder Don Earl says NUTRO’s cat food recall — trigged by “incorrect levels of zinc and potassium” — gives credence to his organization’s test results.

“I feel a certain amount of vindication as a result, particularly as the symptoms are identical to those reported by legions of dog owners,” he told us.

But Earl is still worried about what pet food makers can legally put in their products.

“The most frightening aspect of the situation is that from the research I’ve done, I believe it’s possible to formulate a food within AAFCO tolerances, and still end up with a product that would be lethal to pets within a matter of days to weeks.”

NUTRO, however, disputes PFPSA’s lab results.

“The claims regarding the safety of Nutro pet food in a recent report posted on the Pet Food Product Safety Alliance website are unfounded,” the company states on its Web site. “In order for a food to provide all the essential nutrition for a pet, it must exceed the minimum requirements for all essential nutrients. AAFCO has established Nutrient Profiles which identify these minimum dietary levels for all essential nutrients in canine pet food products….the 260- 400 mg/kg diet levels of Zinc found in NUTRO® Natural Choice Chicken, Meal, Rice and Oatmeal Formula (which converts to approximately 288-444 mg/kg dry matter) are well within AAFCO recommended levels.”

NUTRO didn’t disclose the levels of zinc and potassium in its recalled cat foods, but said it was taking immediate action to pull the products off the market.

ConsumerAffairs.com contacted Trouw Nutrition, which supplied the zinc and potassium premix used in NUTRO’s recalled cat food. The company did not return our call.

NUTRO, however, has advised consumers to immediately stop feeding the recalled food to their cats.

But Gayle S. of Nevada — whose Labradoodle recently become gravely ill after eating NUTRO’s dry puppy food — says that warning isn’t broad enough to calm her fears. She urges pet owners to immediately stop feeding their dogs and cats any NUTRO products.

“I want them (NUTRO) to pull every single product off the shelves,” she told us. “It almost killed my puppy. I know something is wrong with that food. And, as a consumer, I would to see NUTRO off the market until it (the company) is 100 percent sure its food is not tainted.”

Gayle says her five-month-old puppy, William, recently stopped eating, started vomiting yellow bile, and experiencing explosive diarrhea.

“My dog exploded in the vet’s office,” she says. “There was urine and blood dripping from the dog. He had terrible diarrhea. When he tried to poop, red blood would be dripping out of the dog. That’s what scared me.”

Campylobacter

Tests revealed William had Giardia, an infection that Gayle says the puppy could have caught from his litter mates. William in now on medication for that illness.

But the tests also revealed that William had another disease — one Gayle’s vet said could be caused by contaminated food. That disease is called Campylobacter.

We shared William’s test results with veterinary toxicologist Steven Hansen, director of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal’s (ASPCA) Poison Control Center.

“This looks like an interesting case,” he said. “Campylobacter can be found in normal dogs and cats, which does complicate this. Yes, this bacterium can be obtained from contaminated food, water, fresh meats and the environment. I am very hopeful that the exact packets that were fed this pup will be cultured for possible bacterial contamination. Otherwise, there are many ways that dogs can consume material contaminated with Campylobacter.”

Back in Nevada, Gayle continues to search for answers about her puppy’s illness.

She’s already contacted NUTRO and the FDA about William’s illness. NUTRO, she says, told her “nothing could be wrong with its food” and did not offer to test William’s food.

The FDA is now is trying to make arrangements to test William’s food. PetSmart has also offered to analyze the puppy’s food.

Conflicting stories

NUTRO’s recall came just days after ConsumerAffairs.com appealed a denial by the (FDA) to release consumer complaints and lab results related to the company’s pet food.

ConsumerAffairs.com requested the documents last Spring under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The FDA denied the request, saying the release of those the records could interfere with law enforcement proceedings. An FDA official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, also told ConsumerAffairs.com that our request was denied because the agency was investigating NUTRO.

The FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), however, later issued a press release claiming NUTRO was not under investigation. But the CVM is not the FDA division that handles complaints about pet food and is not the division that confirmed the investigation.

ConsumerAffairs.com has also independently confirmed that FDA agents have investigated the deaths of dogs that ate NUTRO pet food.

“Though the reports on whether the FDA is investigating Nutro have been conflicting, the FDA’s official position is that there is no pending investigation of Nutro,” said New York attorney, Cameron Stracher, who filed the appeal for ConsumerAffairs.com. “Therefore, the FDA may not rely on the ‘law enforcement’ exemption of FOIA because, according to the FDA, there is no pending enforcement proceeding against Nutro.”

Meanwhile, NUTRO said pet owners who have any of the recalled cat food can return the products for a full refund. Pet owners who have questions or concerns about the recall can contact NUTRO at 1-800-833-5330.

Whats in your Dog’s food?

Survey shows cat and dog owners don’t know what ingredients are in their pets’ bowls.

Posted: October 10, 2008, 5 a.m. EDT

Despite the world’s largest pet food recall last year, a national survey released this week revealed many pet owners don’t know what ingredients are in their pets’ food.

The pet food survey was conducted online in August by Harris Interactive and commissioned by the Wellness brand of natural pet food and treats. Of the 1,305 U.S. pet owners surveyed, 906 were dog owners, and 783 were cat owners.

According to the survey, two-thirds of the pet owners said they feed their pets as if they were members of their families. However, 56 percent of pet owners said they always or often read the label of their own packaged foods, compared to 38 percent of dog owners and 38 percent of cat owners who said they always or often read the labels on their pets’ food. Wellness also reported that only 38 percent of those surveyed said they understand all the ingredients listed on their dog food and cat food labels.

Additional findings released by Wellness included:

  • Fifty-six percent worry their cat or dog food contains ingredients they wouldn’t want their pets to consume.
  • More than half dog or cat owners (55 percent) don’t know what federal body is charged with regulating pet food quality.
  • When asked to name the first ingredient listed on the label of their cat’s dry food, 48 percent of cat owners answered they are not sure.
  • When asked to name the first ingredient listed on the label of their dog’s dry food, 44 percent of dog owners answered they are not sure.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes