<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mountaintop Natural Pets &#187; loss of a pet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mountaintopnaturalpets.info/tag/loss-of-a-pet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mountaintopnaturalpets.info</link>
	<description>ASCHAE&#039;s DogBlog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:04:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Settlement To Be Argued In Pet Food Recall Case</title>
		<link>http://mountaintopnaturalpets.info/2008/10/14/settlement-to-be-argued-in-pet-food-recall-case/</link>
		<comments>http://mountaintopnaturalpets.info/2008/10/14/settlement-to-be-argued-in-pet-food-recall-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aschae</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pet Food Recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss of a pet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[menu foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet food recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salmonella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tainted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aschae.wordpress.com/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MOUNT LAUREL, N.J. (AP) Oct 13, 2008 ― What kind of monetary value can be placed on a pet? That&#8217;s just one of the issues expected to be raised during oral arguments Tuesday before a Camden federal judge over a $32 million settlement for contaminated pet food lawsuits. Menu Foods Income Fund recalled millions of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cbstv_attribution">MOUNT LAUREL, N.J. (AP) Oct 13, 2008 ― </span> What kind of monetary value can be placed on a pet?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just one of the issues expected to be raised during oral arguments Tuesday before a Camden federal judge over a $32 million settlement for contaminated pet food lawsuits.</p>
<p>Menu Foods Income Fund recalled millions of containers of pet food last year. The products were sold under some 90 different brand names.</p>
<p>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration found the food contained melamine, a chemical used to make plastics. The chemical was traced to contaminated wheat gluten imported from China.</p>
<p>More than 9,500 people in the United States and Canada have made claims. Some 28 have filed objections to the settlement.</p>
<p>Some of those objections question how they can determine the monetary value of a pet considered a close companion.</p>
<p style="white-space:nowrap"><img style="border:0px" src="http://tarpipe.com/img/tarpipe.png" />&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://tarpipe.com/share/?t=Settlement+To+Be+Argued+In+Pet+Food+Recall+Case&u=http%3A%2F%2Fmountaintopnaturalpets.info%2F2008%2F10%2F14%2Fsettlement-to-be-argued-in-pet-food-recall-case%2F&b=Reading %22Settlement+To+Be+Argued+In+Pet+Food+Recall+Case%22">Share now!</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mountaintopnaturalpets.info/2008/10/14/settlement-to-be-argued-in-pet-food-recall-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
